🌓 Hp Gpu Adreno 530
Fullcomparison data of benchmarks Adreno 530 @ 650MHz vs Adreno 530 @ 624MHz GPU, which GPU is best for gaming and speed test performance comparison, specs difference. GPU comparisons 11-01-2021. Comprehensive comparison data of Adreno 530 @ 650MHz vs Adreno 530 @ 624MHz which GPU is better. Extreme benchmark examination of graphics chips
VideoCard Benchmarks - Over 200,000 Video Cards and 900 Models Benchmarked and compared in graph form - This page is an alphabetical listing of video card models we have obtained benchmark information for.
Basedon 5,406 user benchmarks for the AMD Radeon 530 and the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen iGPU), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 683 GPUs. 9% HP(103C 8496) 1GB Worst Bench: 4% HP(103C 84E7) 1GB. Poor: 4% Great: 9%. SPEED RANK: 317 th / 683. 3,089 User Benchmarks. Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs
GPU Qualcomm Adreno™ 540; Change OS/API/Etc. Android . OpenGL . Qualcomm Adreno™ 540 . Android Android . OpenGL . Qualcomm Adreno™ 530 . Android . Vulkan . Qualcomm Adreno™ 530. Add another device. Please sign in to compare more devices! Car Chase Onscreen 1417 Frames (24.0 Fps) Offscreen 1428 Frames (24.2 Fps) Onscreen 1149 Frames
GPU Adreno 540: Adreno 530 . Snapdragon 835, found in HTC U11, is manufactured through a 10nm technological process. It has 8 cores running at up to 2.45GHz. [Specs and Info] HP ZBook Power G9 - for the experienced professionals. Jul 19, 2022. REVIEWS view more . MSI Summit E16 Flip Evo (A12M) review. Jul 21, 2022.
GPUAdreno 530 memiliki sebuah fitur baru Spectra ISP yang akan hadir bersama CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 820. Fitur ini akan membuat kualitas gambar lebih baik dari sebelumnya. ISP bisa mengatur 3 sensor kamera untuk bekerja secara bersamaan dengan resolusi maksimal 25 megapixel dan perekaman video 30 fps di resolusi maksimal.
GPU specifications may vary by partner configuration. Please refer to partner websites for GPU specifications. Radeon™ 610 GPU. Compute Units. 5. Boost Frequency. Up to 1030 MHz. Peak Pixel Fill-Rate. Up to 4.1 GP/s. Peak Texture Fill-Rate. Up to 20.6 GT/s. Max Performance. Up to 660 GFLOPs. ROPs. 4. Stream Processors. 320. Texture Units. 20.
Therange of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD Radeon 530 is just 3.75%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD Radeon 530 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.
GraphicsCard Rankings (Price vs Performance) August 2022 GPU Rankings.. We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games.Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money.Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings.The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs.
yiyhw. A Radeon 530 Ă© uma placa de vĂdeo dedicada de nĂvel de entrada para portáteis, que foi lançada em 2017. De acordo com a AMD, existem várias versões diferentes com 384 ou 320 unidades shader e memĂłria gráfica DDR3 ou GDDR5 de 64 bits. No entanto, elas nĂŁo se baseiam em um dos novos chips Polaris da sĂ©rie RX, mas provavelmente usam a mesma arquitetura que a Radeon R7 M445 / M440 / M340 / M260 / 8650M / 8590M 384 unidades shader, GCN de 28 nm e M430 / M330 / M230 320 unidades shader, 28 nm Sun GCN. A AMD afirma que a velocidade da Radeon 530 pode atingir o anterior, o desempenho de jogos da Radeon 530 deve cair entre a Radeon R7 M440 320 unidades shader, DDR3, Radeon R7 M460 384 unidades shader, DDR3 e Radeon R7 M445 320 unidades shader, GDDR5 veja estas páginas para benchmarks de jogos detalhados. Jogos graficamente intensivos, como Dishonored 2, Call of Duty Infinite Warfare or XCOM 2 nĂŁo devem rodar fluentemente com esta GPU. Jogos menos exigentes, como Overwatch, Fifa 17 com uma CPU rápida, ou Farming Simulator 17, funcionariam bem, mas usando configurações de detalhes de baixas a mĂ©dias. Para benchmarks de jogos detalhados, visite as páginas das placas anteriormente vinculadas. De acordo com as especificações, a versĂŁo DDR3 pode ser mais lenta do que a Radeon 520, especificada com 320 shaders e 500 SerieRadeon 530 384 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzRadeon 520 320 GHz64 Bit 2250 MHzArquiteturaGCNPipelines384 - unificadoVelocidade do nĂşcleo1024 MHzVelocidade da memĂłria2250 MHzLargura do Bus de MemĂłria64 BitModelo de memĂłriaDDR3, GDDR5Max. quantidade de memĂłria2048 MBMemĂłria compartilhadanĂŁoAPIDirectX 12, Shader OpenGL nmCaracterĂsticasDirectX 12, Mantle, OpenGL, OpenCL VulkanData do Link Ă página do Fabricante Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time SpyAMD Radeon HD 8180...Intel UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EUAMD Radeon R8 M365DXAMD Radeon Pro WX 3100...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Scoremin 486 avg 514 median 497 2% max 559 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphicsmin 424 avg median 443 1% max 490 Points Intel UHD Graphics 605...AMD Radeon R7 M360Intel UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EUAMD Radeon R7 M445AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000/3000Intel Iris Plus Graphics 650...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 69759 avg 105231 median 107458 13% max 136248 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 43413 avg 52303 median 49386 7% max 67025 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Scoremin 3749 avg 6603 median 6371 7% max 8707 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphicsmin 6266 avg 8145 median 9210 2% max 9466 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Scoremin 1062 avg 1419 median 1386 0% max 1810 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphicsmin 1224 avg 1579 median 1542 2% max 1990 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphicsmin 56520 avg 67535 median 8% max 89565 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Scoremin 2121 avg 2496 median 2508 4% max 2935 Points 3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPUmin 2113 avg 2355 median 2327 2% max 2654 Points ...AMD FirePro W4190MAMD FirePro W4170MNVIDIA Quadro K620M...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark Vantage 3DM Vant. Perf. total +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. totalmin 6283 avg 6338 median 2% max 6392 Points 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysXmin 5074 avg 5369 median 3% max 5663 Points ...AMD Radeon R7 M360Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs Tiger Lake-H...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standardmin 16614 avg 17513 median 17513 19% max 18412 Points ...ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5870...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +3DMark 06min 9517 avg 11377 median 11481 16% max 13132 Points Unigine Valley - Unigine Valley DXmin avg median 2% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven DX 11min avg 17 median 17 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Unigine Heaven OpenGLmin avg median 6% max fps Unigine Heaven - Heaven highmin avg 20 median 20 4% max fps Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading 32bit +Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading 32bitmin 5166 avg 7436 median 7731 5% max 9411 pontos Cinebench Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench - Cinebench OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 10% max fps Cinebench R15 Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bitmin avg median 11% max fps Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bitmin avg 98 median 98 98% max 98 % GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min avg median 3% max fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 12% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 3% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenGFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Room GPUmin 189 avg median 1% max 222 Samples/s LuxMark 64Bit - LuxMark Sala GPUmin 353 avg median 1% max 420 Samples/s ComputeMark - ComputeMark Resultmin 741 avg 992 median 895 1% max 1341 pontos Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *min 43 avg median 12% max 58 Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiencymin avg median 13% max Points per Watt Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Points per Watt 15% Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultraClock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark - Gama de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica - MĂ©dia de valores benchmark para essa solução gráfica* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance Benchmarks de jogosOs seguintes benchmarks tĂŞm origem em nossos benchmarks de portáteis de análise O desempenho depende da memĂłria gráfica utilizada, frequĂŞncia, processador, configurações do sistema, controladores, e sistemas operacionais. Assim os resultados nĂŁo tem que representantes para todos os portáteis com esta GPU. Para informações detalhadas sobre os resultados de benchmark, clique no nĂşmero de fps. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 ultra 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados ultra. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks BenchmarksVery Low Overall Quality DX11 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks BenchmarksLowest Preset 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks BenchmarksLow Preset TAA 1920x1080 baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » NĂŁo Ă© jogável com a maioria dos notebooks testados. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados BenchmarksMedium Preset 1366x768 baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1366x768 alto 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados alto. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080 » Jogável em configuração de detalhes com todos os notebooks testados baixo. baixo 1280x720 mĂ©dia 1920x1080
PowerVR GE8320 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530PowerVR GE8320 ► remove from comparisonThe PowerVR GE8320 by Imagination Technologies is an integrated graphics card for mid-range ARM SoCs. It belongs to the Series8XE series of GPUs GE8xx0 and supports OpenGL ES OpenCL Android NN HAL API and Vulkan Adreno 530 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for mostly Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES and DirectX The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430, the 530 is especially faster in demanding in PowerVR GE8320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboMediatek Helio G378 x 1800 MHz? MHz680 MHzMediatek Helio G358 x 2300 MHz? MHz680 MHzMediatek MT87688 x 1500 MHz? MHz650 MHz» show 6 moremin. - max.? - 650 MHz? - 680 MHzCPU in Adreno 530GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / TurboQualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro4 x 2400 MHz? MHz653 MHzQualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM89964 x 2200 MHz? MHz624 MHzmin. - max.? - 650 MHz624 - 680 MHzBenchmarks3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphicsmin 6785 avg 11520 median 11994 1% max 13939 Points min 24310 avg 32869 median 32997 4% max 40761 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphicsmin 6867 avg 7128 median 7128 1% max 7389 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited min 494 avg 802 median 810 4% max 1214 Points min 2649 avg 3348 median 3425 18% max 3806 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 445 avg 747 median 764 2% max 871 Points min 3401 avg 4503 median 11% max 5006 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimitedmin 302 avg median 493 3% max 1166 Points min 2252 avg 2605 median 16% max 2893 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Graphicsmin 253 avg median 0% max 516 Points min 2488 avg 2996 median 3108 2% max 3253 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedGFXBench DX / GLBenchmark GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8320 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16min 18 avg median 26 1% max 31 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 min avg median 56 2% max 88 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8320 GFXBench DX / GLBenchmark - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16min 13 avg median 20 0% max 23 fps GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530 min avg median 88 1% max 96 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattanmin avg median 17 5% max 20 fps min 23 avg median 32 9% max 48 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Manhattan Offscreenmin avg median 10 1% max 12 fps min 26 avg 43 median 3% max 49 fps GFXBench - GFXBench 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreenmin avg median 1% max fps min avg median 7 1% max 12 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps min avg median 1% max 11 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreenmin avg median 7 1% max fps min 12 avg median 15 2% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreenmin avg median 0% max fps min 15 avg median 19 1% max 19 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreenmin avg median 0% max fps min avg median 13 0% max 20 fps GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreenmin avg 3 median 0% max fps min 14 avg median 19 0% max 20 fps Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPUmin 15496 avg 15903 median 15557 2% max 16655 Points Basemark X - Basemark X High Qualitymin 21420 avg 30602 median 33028 75% max 35449 Points Basemark X - Basemark X Medium Qualitymin 28538 avg 37215 median 38353 85% max 41500 Points Basemark GPU - Basemark GPU Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Testsmin 2578 avg 8110 median 8% max 13202 Points min 4781 avg 5512 median 6% max 6042 Points PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Testsmin 575 avg 1986 median 3% max 3544 Points min 1913 avg 2183 median 4% max 2461 Points Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming IndexPower Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *min avg median 1% max Watt Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8320 → 100% n=19Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 334% n=19 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation Game BenchmarksThe following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number. low 100% PowerVR GE832042 fps high ultra low 100% PowerVR GE832048 fps high ultra high 100% PowerVR GE8320 ~ 29 fps low 100% PowerVR GE8320222424252525252525 ~ 24 fps med. 100% PowerVR GE8320222324252525252525 ~ 24 fps high PowerVR GE83200 !0 ! ~ 0 fps ultra low 100% PowerVR GE832030313156 ~ 37 fps ultra 100% PowerVR GE832029303143 ~ 33 fps low 100% PowerVR GE83204758 ~ 53 fps high 100% PowerVR GE832057 fps high 100% PowerVR GE832030 fps 143% Adreno 5300 !30303030565859596060 ~ 43 fps low Adreno 5302929303030303030303030 ~ 30 fps high 100% PowerVR GE832030 fps 97% Adreno 5300 !29292930303030303030303048 ~ 29 fps low 100% PowerVR GE832010192728 ~ 21 fps high 100% PowerVR GE8320122224 ~ 19 fps low high 100% PowerVR GE8320242426 ~ 25 fps 172% Adreno 5303551 ~ 43 fps Average Gaming PowerVR GE8320 → 100%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 137%Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 158%For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming 15. 0633520 checking url part for id 9411 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s 2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 111425 +0200 + ... 4 composed specs + ... 5 did output specs +0s ... 6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9411 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 9411 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 7062 + ... 11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values + ... 17 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 19 Got 94 rows for game benchmarks. + ... 20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 21 got data and put it in $dataArray + ... 22 benchmarks composed for output. + ... 23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 24 return log + ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11
Adreno™ Graphics Processing UnitsGraphic-intensive games, animations and apps have become an important part of mobile experiences. That’s why the all-in-one design of the Snapdragon processor includes the Qualcomm Adreno™ graphics processing unit GPU. The Adreno GPU accelerates the rendering of complex geometries to deliver high-performance graphics and a rich user experience with low power consumption. If your users think your mobile UI, games and advanced graphics applications look good now, wait until they’ve seen them on the Snapdragon processor with the Adreno how you can improve graphics in your apps without trading off battery life by having a look at our videos on hardware and rendering with the Adreno GPU. Then start optimizing your graphics, gaming and heterogeneous computing applications with the Adreno GPU 530 GPUThe Adreno 530 GPU is embedded into the Snapdragon 820 processor. Adreno 530 GPU offersIn comparison with the predecessor Adreno 430 GPU*Up to 50% better graphics performanceUp to 40% more power efficientUp to 40% faster General-Purpose GPU GPGPU performanceAdvanced API support, including OpenGL ES to help enable more-complex and more-efficient mobile 3D graphics for apps and will be the first GPU to support new Vulkan API. Vulkan enables the next generation of graphics performance by adding multi-threaded command buffer generation and explicit control of advanced graphics capabilities within Snapdragon’s Adreno GPUsShared Virtual memory that enables simultaneous data sharing between the OpenCL host and the API SupportQualcomm is on the Board of Promoters for Khronos Group. Its subsidiary, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. QTI, has announced support for Vulkan™ starting with the Adreno 530 GPU in the Snapdragon 820 processor. Qualcomm is also announcing upcoming support for Vulkan in QTI’s developer tools, including Snapdragon Profiler and the Adreno SDK. Qualcomm will also be releasing a community edition of user-mode Vulkan driver binaries for Adreno A4xx and A5xx GPUs†soon. You can use these tools with the Vulkan API as part of the process of optimizing your apps for commercial devices powered by the Snapdragon 820 430 GPUAdreno 430 GPU is embedded into the Snapdragon 810 processors and offersSupport for console-quality graphics features – such as enhanced lighting and shading; realistic faces and animation; and deeper 3D detail through hardware tessellation and geometry shaders – at up to Ultra HD resolutionUp to 30% improvement in graphics performance over predecessor Adreno 420 GPU*Up to 20% improvement in power efficiency over predecessor Adreno 420 GPU*Up to 100% faster General-Purpose GPU GPGPU performance over predecessor Adreno 420 GPUDynamic hardware tessellation designed to support visually realistic scenes, with lower memory use and lower power consumptionAdvanced API support, including OpenGL ES and DirectX to help enable more-complex and more-efficient mobile 3D graphics for apps and gamesSupport for new OpenGL ES features like compute shadersSupport for the Android Extension Pack, which includes compute, tessellation and geometry shaders for compatibility with new gaming consoles and GPU FamilyAdrenoSnapdragon ChipsetAPIsSample of Commercial DevicesOpenGL ESOpen CLRenderScriptDirect X200Snapdragon Sony,HTC203Snapdragon 200HTC Desire 516, LG W5, Sony Falcon DS205Snapdragon S2HTC, Samsung220Snapdragon S3HTC Droid DNA225Snapdragon S4HTC Desire500, HTC Desire600, SamsungGT-i8550 Galaxy Win302Snapdragon Embedded 400Samsung, HTC, Motorola, Sony,305Snapdragon 400Samsung, HTC, Sony306Snapdragon 410Samsung, HTC, Sony320Snapdragon 600SamsungGS4, HTC One, LG G, Amazon Fire TV330Snapdragon 800Samsung GS5, Sony Z2, LG G Pro2330Snapdragon 801Sony Xperia Z2, HTC One M8, Gionee330Snapdragon 610HTC, Samsung405Snapdragon CS, GS & Full Samsung418Snapdragon 808420Snapdragon 805Samsung S5, Pantech430Snapdragon CS, GS & TS OnePlus 2, ZTE Axon Pro, HTC One M9, LG G Flex2530Snapdragon GS & Full ProfileYesTBDTBD * Source Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. data.†Product is based on a published Khronos Specification, and is expected to pass the Khronos Conformance Testing Process when available.
hp gpu adreno 530